essay代写,代写assignment,paper代写,代写留学作业,英国作业

导航切换

QQ:
153688106

二维码

当前位置:主页 > paper代写 > 代写美国paper >

代写paper:Morals and Ethical Prin

浏览: 日期:2020-01-13

  本次代写美国paper的内容是根据自己经历过的或者看见过的有关Morals and Ethical Principles的问题作以分析,为保护客户隐私,只发布关于此paper的写作要求

  以下是此次paper的具体要求:

  assignment description:

  
开始之前,请务必阅读教学大纲中的分析论文说明。以下问题应构成您的分析报告1的基础:
描述你的工作或个人生活中的一种情况,无论是有经验的还是有见证的,在这种情况下做出或采取了一项道德上的重大决定或行动。哪些利益相关者受到决策或行动的影响?什么会被认为是“正确的”结果?什么会被认为是“错误的”?为什么?作出决定或采取行动的人(或多人)可能遵守什么道德原则?什么样的偏见可能会妨碍一个人(或多个人)做出最好的决定或采取适当的行动?个人(或个人)各自的组织可能采取了哪些措施来预防和/或补救这种情况?

 

  Describe in syllabus:

  Analysis Papers (due Thurs March 1 and April 19)

  在教学大纲的课程表部分,你会注意到在学期中有两次你被要求提交“分析报告”。我会给你提供两个问题(贴在黑板上),你可以(单独)写两篇(~5页)的paper来回答。这些问题要求你考虑一个适用于个人经历和/或课堂阅读的主题。你的两篇分paper将根据本教学大纲第10页的评分标准进行评分。

  Analysis Paper Rubric (1)

Analysis Paper Rubric (1)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Issues

3.0 pts

Level 3: Completely and thoughtfully identifies all ethical/social concerns in a given problem/case.

2.0 pts

Level 2: Identifies most of the ethical/social concerns in a given problem/case. Most significant points are identified.

1.0 pts

Level 1: Identifies some of the ethical/social concerns in a given problem/case. Some important points are missing.

0.0 pts

Level 0: Identification of ethical /social concerns is sparse or missing.

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupports Arguments

3.0 pts

Level 3: Able to support a position with a substantial amount of information, little or no bias, and valid arguments.

2.0 pts

Level 2: Able to support a position with adequate information and few logical fallacies.

1.0 pts

Level 1: Most points are supported with adequate information. Some important points are missing and/or support for positions lacks substantial explanation.

0.0 pts

Level 0: Inconsistent in articulation of position and/or offers little or no supporting evidence.

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Course Concepts

3.0 pts

Level 3: Integrates course concepts consistently and accurately.

2.0 pts

Level 2: Integrates course concepts fairly well, with few inaccuracies.

1.0 pts

Level 1: Integrates some course concepts, however, with some inaccuracies.

0.0 pts

Level 0: Very few course concepts integrated.

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStructure

3.0 pts

Level 3: Presentation is smooth, polished and organized; flows well.

2.0 pts

Level 2: Presentation flows smoothly with occasional confusion or rough patches between ideas.

0.0 pts

Level 1/Level 0: Paper is disorganized; little flow; vague; difficult to understand.

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLanguage

3.0 pts

Level 3: Writing is free or almost free of errors.

2.0 pts

Level 2: Occasional errors in writing, but they don’t represent a major distraction.

0.0 pts

Level 1/Level 0: Errors are so numerous that they obscure meaning.

3.0 pts

Total Points: 15.0